Here are a few indisputable evidence the existence of God, the Supreme Creator of people, all things and life. Immediately I would like to point out that the words Truth, Axiom, Fact, Truth are synonyms, denoting the same thing.
He is the One who created the heavens and the earth out of nothing... (Quran, 6:101)
Do the unbelievers not see that the heavens and the earth were one and that We separated them and created all living things out of water? Will they not believe? (Quran, 21:30)
4 axioms proving the existence of God
- ⇒ The first axiom that proves the existence of Almighty God is the axiom of laws. Our universe is filled with many physical laws. For example, the law of gravity, the law of universal gravitation, Ohm's law, the law of friction, Newton's law, etc. If you pick up any thing and let it go, it will immediately fall to the ground. But did this object itself establish for itself that it would be attracted to the surface of the Earth, or did the Earth establish the law of attraction? Or maybe someone else established the law of attraction for the Earth and all objects? Similarly, we can give an example with all other laws that operate in our universe. Who made all these laws? Our axiom states: "If there are laws, then there must be someone who established them." After all, laws by themselves cannot be established. The question arises: who established all these laws of the universe? The only correct answer is God, the Creator of all things, Earth, Heaven and all life.
- ⇒ The second axiom proves the very existence of God. It is called the axiom of order. For example, you once came home and saw a terrible mess and mess in your home. The wallpaper on the walls is peeled off, the TV is broken, the books are scattered, the computer is damaged. Of course, you will be frightened and leave your home for a certain period. After a break, you return to your house and see complete order in it. Installed new tv and the computer, the wallpaper is new and everything is in perfect order. The question arises: can order restore itself? On my own? The axiom states: if there is order, then there is also the one who established or brought it. Now it's time to look at our bodies. Do they have some order, or is everything arranged and functioning chaotically? If you look at the sky, what can you see? You can observe some order: each Star has its own specific place! If you look into nature, you can also see complete harmony! Your heart is ordered, it contracts its muscle at certain time intervals, and the blood flows in an orderly manner through the arteries and veins! The whole universe lives in perfect order! Therefore, a reasonable and justified question arises: who established order and ordered all the celestial bodies and what is inside them? The only reasonable answer is God.
- ⇒ The third axiom that proves the existence of the Creator is the trace axiom. For example, if there is snow on the road, and then a car drives along the street, then in any case, a trace remains on the snow. Now we transfer the example to life, the universe and people. Or take any object from those that surround us. Everything around us is a trace of someone's work or activity. Music is the trace of the composer's activity, the picture is the trace of the artist, the computer is the trace of the developers and engineers who have invested a lot of work in its creation, the book is the trace of the writers' work. And this list is endless. The third axiom, which proves the existence of God, states: “If there is a trace, then there must be someone who left it! A trace never appears on its own!” Man, everything that exists, life - this is the trace that indicates to all of us the presence of the Creator.
- ⇒ Finally, the fourth, most interesting axiom, which is called the axiom of limitation. Our mind is arranged in such a way that it can only understand the essence of three things: man, the created world and life. Our mind is able to know only within the framework of these three parameters. What is a person, life and the whole world? If we disassemble a person, we can see that he is a completely limited creature and is completely dependent on the factors that surround him. This is food, water, rest, etc. If we talk about life, then it is a certain time period that is given to a certain living being. And this segment also has limitations. All things, Heaven and Earth are also limited. Life is limited, man is limited, all material and non-material worlds are also limited. The fourth axiom points out: “Limited things and objects are not capable of limiting themselves. Someone limited them and gave them boundaries that they cannot go beyond. The question arises: who limited everything that exists (heaven, earth and all worlds), life and people? There is only one correct and reasonable answer - this is the Lord God. He Himself is not limited by anything, does not eat, does not sleep, does not need anything ...
Creation of all things, heaven and earth
Video: "Facts of the Quran"
Meditate! There is still a mass of evidence that proves to us the existence of the Creator of all things. For example, what is more complex in structure, a picture on the wall, or Heaven and Earth? Of course, everything that exists is many times more complicated than a picture hanging on the wall. Question: "Is it possible to think that this picture itself appears on the wall?" Of course not. So, is it possible to consider that such complex worlds independently appeared and were ordered? There is only one conclusion - all these worlds were created by someone. And the only reasonable answer is that everything that exists was created by the Almighty God, who is not limited by anything and does not need anything.
The video contains very easily accessible information on how to believe in God correctly:
May the Supreme Creator make me and you constantly remember Him.
Koran 21:30
Statements of modern scientists-researchers about God
Who does not want to see anything but chance in this harmony, which is revealed with such obviousness in the structure starry sky, he must ascribe Divine wisdom to this occasion.
Astronomer Madler
We have seen the work of the Creator in this world, which is unknown to other people. Look into biology, look at any organ human body or even the smallest insect. You will find so many amazing things there that you will not have enough time to study. It gives me and many of my employees the feeling that there is something great and wonderful. This Someone is the cause of the creation of the universe, and this Cause cannot be understood by us.
Dr. David R. Inglis,
Senior Physicist, National Laboratory, Argon, Illinois, USA
I can't imagine the universe and human life without some comprehending beginning, without a source of spiritual "warmth" that lies outside of matter and its laws.
Andrey Dmitrievich Sakharov,
Faith begins with the knowledge that the Supreme Intelligence created the Universe and man. It is not difficult for me to believe this, because the fact that there is a plan and, therefore, Reason is irrefutable. The order in the universe, which unfolds before our eyes, itself testifies to the truth of the greatest and sublime statement: "In the beginning - God."
Arthur Compton,
greatest physicist of the 20th century, Nobel laureate
The meaning and joy of my science comes to me in those rare moments when I discover something new and say to myself: “So this is how God created it!”. My goal is just to understand a small corner of God's plan.
Henry Schaeffer,
renowned quantum chemist
In Sura Al-Mulk, the Almighty Creator says to mankind:
67:3 He created the seven heavens one above the other. You will not see any inconsistency in the creation of the Merciful. Take another look. Do you see any crack?
67:4 Then look again and again, and your gaze will return to you humiliated, weary.
Does God Really Exist - Evidence? Sooner or later, every thinking person asks himself this question. If you have thought about this, you are not alone. After all, this question has been the main question of philosophy since ancient times to this day ("What is primary? Consciousness or matter?").
Based on the answer to the question "Is there a God?" The human world is divided into 3 categories:
- Some people are believers- believe that God exists and they do not need proof of his existence.
- Others are atheists- believe that the world is material and do not believe in the non-material God, as in the main Designer and Creator of this world.
- The third is agnostic- believe that it is pointless to discuss the question of whether God really exists, since it is impossible to prove the existence of something that cannot be “touched” or “see”.
One way or another, but the answer to the question, to believe or not to believe in the existence of God, affects our entire life. How exactly this influence occurs, you will learn from this amazing 3-minute video.
Proof of the existence of God. VIDEO
So, today, both believers and non-believers believe that it is impossible to rationally prove the existence of God. Only the reasons for believing so are different for both.
Believers believe that God is revealed only in purity of heart, and not with the help of a proud and presumptuous mind. Unbelievers believe that only science is objective and since it is impossible to measure, fix the fact of the existence of God, then it does not exist.
But few people know that since the philosophy of the Middle Ages there is a tradition and practice of proving the existence of God. The philosopher and scholastic theologian Thomas Aquinas owns the works in which he gave 5 proofs of the existence of God. Also, the philosopher of those times Anselm of Canterbury cited evidence of the existence of God in his writings.
Strictly speaking, the question, "Is consciousness or matter primary?" is the main question of philosophy. In other words, this question can be formulated as follows: “Is there a God?”, “Who created matter?”, “What happened before the big bang?”, “Could life on Earth have arisen by chance? and so on.
If you want to know in detail All 16 Proofs Whether God Really Exists, derived by philosophers, you can contact to this article. This list includes, among other things, 5 Proofs for the Existence of God by Thomas Aquinas.
Here I will give only a few of them - the most indisputable and obvious evidence of the existence of God from life itself, noticed by Aristotle and other philosophers.
"Existential proof" of the existence of God
This proof is formulated as follows: for any structure to exist, a continuous input of energy from the outside is required. As soon as the influx of energy from the outside stops, the structure collapses.
Let's look at examples. To build a house, you will spend energy on creating its design, building, then maintaining the house. If you stop supporting the house, it will fall into disrepair. One more example. If you want to have your own garden, you will need to spend energy on preparing the land, planting plants. As soon as you stop applying your work, your energy, weeds will destroy your garden.
Our entire world, including not only the Earth and solar system, but also the entire Universe and the microcosm, is much more complicated than a house and a garden. So why do such complex structures still exist? No doubt because they were created by Someone and maintained by Him ever since.
"The Anthropic Principle of the Universe", as proof of the existence of God
Most likely you have noticed that in recent times, science and religion, which were for a long time in contradiction, recently they have begun to converge again. After all, studies, for example, in the field, show that the world is not so “material” as we previously imagined it to be.
Other useful articlesBut back to the Anthropic Principle of the Universe. Modern science suddenly found out that the emergence of life on Earth, as well as the development of civilization, became possible only thanks to paradoxically to an unlikely combination of extremely harsh conditions. Among them:
And a lot of proportions and interconnections of our most complex world also coincided. Scientists say that the interconnectedness of all these factors is such that the possibility of their accidental coincidence is completely excluded.
"Cosmological proof" of the existence of God
This proof was formulated by Aristotle and was later used by the medieval philosopher Thomas Aquinas as one of the 5 proofs for the existence of God. Most often it is formulated in this form:
Every thing in this world, including the Universe, has a reason for its existence and it is impossible to continue the chain, the sequence of reasons. Eventually we will come to the First Cause.
Not only philosophers, but also other scientists talk about it today (“What was before big bang?"). The answer to the question “What is the root cause of the Universe?” suggests itself. This is God, he is not material, but “ideal”, “spiritual”, like a thought, and is rather not the Cause, but the Creator of the Universe and its Laws.
Is there a God - the opinions of scientists
Moving deeper and deeper into the microcosm and the macrocosm, scientists are increasingly saying that science and religion do not contradict each other at all. Earlier, before the paths of science and religion diverged, many scientists, such as Newton, were theologians.
Isn't it exciting? Would you like to know the answers to these questions: - Why are the secrets of the universe, the laws of physics, the solution of mathematical problems revealed only to selected geniuses? What is their secret? - and n why ancient Greek philosophers in the Golden Age of civilization, revelations about the universe were visited, but now they don’t visit us? Read the answers to these questions in this helpful and informative article.
Summary
I would really like the article “Does God Really Exist – Evidence” to be useful to you. The main conclusion that can be drawn by carefully observing the world around us is that someone created and decorated this world for us. This Someone constantly supports him, and without Him the world could not exist even for a moment.
I wish you all joy in learning new things and inspiration in all your affairs!
There is a mass of different scientific evidence both disproving and proving the existence of God. It is not for nothing that scientists are called by the same affectionate names as historians, identifying them with representatives of the most ancient profession.
Having experience in the media mass media, I can responsibly declare that 99% of public statements are made with the aim of extracting some benefit from this. Our science, which serves the ruling class, is no exception.
Accordingly, they will prove what they were paid for, and then the media will tell you exactly what they were already paid for. Therefore, in today's article we will not touch on scientific evidence for the existence of God, there will be no widely known evidence for the existence of God from Kant.
Let's try to analyze this issue based only on our powers of observation and common sense.
So does God really exist?
Let's look at a person. At the moment of birth, this is a completely helpless being, and many years pass before a worthy member of society appears before society from this being. And then, as far as we can see, not every matured individual becomes a person.
It is so? We cannot put an equal sign between Chikatilo and Rostropovich just because they have the same number of arms, legs and the same gender. It is clear that one of them is not a person in the full sense of the word. By the way, I'm sure that everyone who reads this knows which of them cannot be considered human.
Sorry to digress again, but these digressions are necessary to bring you to a very simple conclusion. In order for a person to become a person in the full sense of the word, that is, physically, intellectually, spiritually, emotionally developed, he must be taught all this.
Yes, people are born different. There are those who show the piano at 2 years old, and he will no longer unhook from it, but there are those like me who have not needed this piano for three hundred years. These addictions, according to the knowledge of the Vedas, are the consequences of our past lives and the desires developed there, but we will not go into this now.
No matter what passions a person is born with, in order for him to become a harmoniously developed being, he must be taught. The first teacher of a person is his family, mom and dad. Then society, a kindergarten, a school, a university, an army, friends, etc., take on his education.
I think that at this stage there should be no questions. Everything seems to be logical and clear. If you really understand everything, then please explain where the rules and principles of behavior came from. in the first family.
Where did the first person who taught everything to the rest come from? Who created and taught him everything he knows now?
There are theories according to which the world evolves from simple to complex. Darwin's theory is a prime example of this. Despite its complete failure, which the author himself admitted at the end of his life, this theory is actively promoted. This happens, rather out of habit and because venerable scientists are so uncomfortable to admit that they have fooled people all their lives.
According to this theory, out of nowhere, suddenly, quite by accident, as a result of a big bad boom, a certain planet itself was created, on which, again by chance, apparently as a result of another woman boom, in some incredible way living cell.
Moreover, it was formed not just anywhere, but in the water, because we all know that life came from the water, the youth may not know, but the older generation remembers this heresy that was hammered into our heads.
Then, again, it is not clear why and why the cell began to develop and the further, the faster and gradually it turned from a ciliate-shoe into a highly developed person - the king of nature, who taught his offspring the rules of behavior in society.
Well, not nonsense?! Even if we accept as true the fact that an incredibly complex compound called a living cell was formed by itself and by chance, then explain why this cell had to develop? She doesn’t have brains, she doesn’t strive for anything, they didn’t tell her about evolution at school. We will not delve further into this theory, any sane person will understand that Darwin's theory of evolution is consistent only if you do not ask questions related to this process.
Does God really exist?
Anastasia, the heroine, in turn claims that the universe appeared as the thought of God, manifested materially. It is immediately, initially perfect and it did not require refinement, that is, a person was created - born originally perfect.
And these statements about the origin of the universe and man already have confirmation, about them below, and this is the best proof the existence of God.
As for evolution, this process undoubtedly takes place. Evolution means a qualitative change in something. And man can certainly evolve.
Man himself has the right to choose how he evolves. Someone chooses physical evolution. Such people monitor their health, count every calorie, go to fitness rooms.
There are those who choose mental and spiritual evolution. These people focus on improving the quality of their thoughts and their soul. It is not for nothing that there is a concept among the people - a person with a wide soul. This is just the one in whom spiritual qualities are developed, and, mind you, we love these more than jocks.
However, many of those who choose the evolution of the spirit for themselves have an interesting effect - the body also becomes harmonious and beautiful. This does not happen by itself, just working on your thoughts leads to the fact that a person himself begins to gradually take care of his body and his health.
But I again got carried away with my favorite topic of human development, forgetting that I wanted to give you a direct proof that God exists. Although, if you think about it, then, in fact, I already did it.
Does God really exist
If you carefully look at the history of mankind known to us, you yourself will understand that the evolution that modern science tells us about has never happened.
There was no caveman who hunted a mammoth with a spear, there was no Pithecanthropus, from which a reasonable man later turned out. The exact opposite is happening. Proof? Please!
Even 30 years ago I could drink water from the Amur River, now it is in nightmare impossible to imagine;
Even 60 years ago, my grandfather, going out on a fishing trip* on the same river, could put an oar between the backs of fish, and it stood upright and did not fall! With such a density there was a chum salmon for spawning.
And if we start comparing the moral principles of a society that lived only 100 years ago and today, we will see that humanity has not yet known such a level of degradation as it is today.
It is quite clear that society is degrading, not developing. The material and technical aspect that we are so proud of is nothing more than an attempt to fill a person with his inherent qualities, such as teleportation, telepathy, imagination, etc.
Many examples can be cited to confirm my idea that humanity is not on the path of progress, but on the path of regression, but I will not do this here. Those who want to think about their lives will see these examples in their lives, and those who are convinced that I am wrong are unlikely to be convinced by my arguments.
I do not want the main idea to be lost, so I want to repeat it again. The main and simplest proof of the existence of God is a person and the knowledge that he possesses, because no one except God could create such an incredibly complex organism as a person and put into it all the knowledge that he had before and has now. We all learn, without knowledge we are nothing. Think about where the knowledge came from in the first person, who gave it to him? There is only one answer!
Glossary:
Putin is not the name of the President accusative, this is the catch of red fish when it goes to spawn.
Scientific evidence for the existence of God
For those who are still interested scientific evidence the existence of God, I copied the article from primeinfo.com.ua. Read it, very informative too.
| An absolute shock to the scientific world was the speech of the famous philosophy professor Anthony Flew. The scientist, who is now well over 80, has been one of the pillars of scientific atheism for many years. For decades, Flue has published books and lectured on the thesis that belief in God is unjustified. However, a series of recent scientific discoveries has forced the great advocate of atheism to change his views. Flue publicly stated that he was wrong, and the universe could not have arisen on its own - it was obviously created by someone more powerful than we can imagine. According to Flue, earlier he, like other atheists, was convinced that once upon a time, the first living matter simply appeared from dead matter. “Today, it is impossible to imagine the construction of an atheistic theory of the origin of life and the appearance of the first organism of reproduction,” Flue says. According to the scientist, modern data on the structure of the DNA molecule irrefutably indicate that it could not have arisen on its own, but is someone's development. The genetic code and the literally encyclopedic volumes of information that a molecule stores in itself refute the possibility of a blind coincidence. British physicist Martin John Rees, who won this year's Templeton Prize, believes that the universe is a very complex thing. Scientist with more than 500 scientific works, received $ 1.4 million for proving the existence of the Creator. Although the physicist himself is an atheist, the Correspondent adds. “According to the director of the International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Anatoly Akimov, the existence of God has been proven by scientific methods.” “God exists, and we can observe the manifestations of His will. This is the opinion of many scientists, they do not just believe in the Creator, but rely on some knowledge.” At the same time, the scientist noted that in past centuries, many physicists believed in God. Moreover, before the time of Isaac Newton, the separation between science and religion did not exist, priests were engaged in science, since they were the most educated people. Newton himself had theological education and often repeated: "I derive the laws of mechanics from the laws of God." When scientists invented the microscope and began to study what was happening inside the cell, the processes of duplication and division of chromosomes caused them a stunning reaction: “How can this be if all this was not provided by the Almighty ?!” “Indeed,” added A. Akimov, “if we talk about the fact that a person appeared on Earth as a result of evolution, then, taking into account the frequency of mutations and the speed of biochemical processes, it would take much more time to create a person from primary cells than the age of the Universe itself” . “In addition,” he continued, “calculations were made that showed that the number of quantum elements in the volume of the radio observable Universe cannot be less than 10155, and it cannot but have superintelligence.” "If all this one system, then, considering it as a computer, we ask: what is beyond the power of a computing system with so many elements? These are unlimited possibilities, more than the most sophisticated and modern computer by an incommensurable number of times!” - emphasized the scientist. In his opinion, what different philosophers called the Universal Mind, the Absolute, this is a super-powerful system, which we identify with the potentialities of the Almighty. “This,” says A. Akimov, “does not contradict the main provisions of the Bible. There, in particular, it is said that God is omnipresent, he is present always and everywhere. We see that this is so: the Lord possesses unlimited possibilities impact on everything that happens. A. Akimov was baptized at the age of 55. "Did you believe in God?" the priest asked him when he arrived at the church. “No, I just realized that it cannot not be!” - answered the scientist. |
Professor of Bashkir state university Nazhip Valitov used to be very far from theology. He is a world-famous chemist, a member of the New York Academy of Sciences, and all his life he dealt exclusively with the problems of his science. And he did not expect that spiritual leaders would be interested in his discoveries.
The monograph of Professor Valitov, published by an academic publishing house, shocked the scientific community. Using the strict language of formulas, Professor Valitov proved that any objects in the Universe interact with each other instantly, regardless of the distance between them. “Before, it was believed that no interaction could take place at a speed exceeding the speed of light,” says Professor Valitov about his discovery. - That's three hundred thousand kilometers per second. But it turned out that electromagnetic and gravitational fields interact instantly.
Chemistry professor Valitov: “I substantiated this theoretically and confirmed it experimentally. And then I was amazed - after all, this indicates the existence in the Universe of some kind of single higher power! After all, in fact, everything is connected with everything. But he did not make global philosophical conclusions in the monograph. He considered that my book was already a rebellion in academic science.
Valitov received an envelope from the Vatican and could not believe his eyes. Najip Khatmullovich did not assume that the department of the Pope was interested in chemistry and physics. And when I translated the text, I was even more surprised. “Dear professor! - wrote the Pope's assistant Monsignor Pedro López Quintana. - His Holiness Pope John Paul II assures you that he dedicates his prayers to you. He also wants you to know that the High Priest appreciates the sentiments that prompted you to write this monograph. Only after careful research and solid expertise, we decided to send you our gratitude.
Professor Valitov felt somewhat uncomfortable: he asked the Pope himself a problem! Imagine what it was like for Catholic bishops to understand four hundred pages of formulas and graphs! And now for Valitov, a man who previously considered himself a materialist and believed that where religion begins, science ends, the Pope himself prays! Najip Khatmullovich took a letter from the Vatican and went to the Supreme Mufti of Russia, Talgat Tadzhutdin. I gave him my book and told him about its essence.
The professor cautiously asked the mufti how one should treat the prayers of the Pope: - I am a Muslim by birth, my grandfather went to Mecca: the Mufti reassured: God is one for all. And I will pray for you too! Professor Valitov re-read the Koran, studied the Bible, studied the Torah. And I was surprised how accurately their texts indicated the essence of his scientific discovery. - "IN holy books major world religions, - says Professor Valitov, - it is written that God is all-seeing and all-hearing.
This definition has often been criticized by some atheist scholars in the past. Their logic was, at first glance, ironclad: since the speed of light has a limit, the Lord God, if he exists, cannot instantly hear and see what a person has done. However, it turned out that the thought of each of us is material. The atoms in the molecules that make up the neurons of the brain perform translational, oscillatory and rotational movements. And the process of thinking is necessarily accompanied by the emission and absorption of force lines of electromagnetic and gravitational fields.
This process can be instantly detected from anywhere in the universe. “So God knows our every thought?” - Yes. There is a force to which everything is subject. We can call it the Lord, Allah, the World Mind. The essence does not change. And the interaction in the world is instant, no matter where the objects are.
I came to the conclusion that the Bible, the Koran and the Torah, among a considerable number of discrepancies, have many completely identical postulates. And their fundamental truths fit into my calculations. So there is nothing new in these formulas. Only confirmation of what was given to mankind over a millennium ago.
Colleagues calculated: Professor Valitov's theory refutes 12 laws of thermodynamics, 20 sections of chemistry, 28 physics, 40 sections of mathematics. He invited them to check their conclusions and no one could refute them. The most paradoxical is that seventeen industrial processes introduced by him in chemical production are based on Valitov's theoretical conclusions about the instantaneous effect. Including the production of the best rocket fuel in the world. Colleagues from Canada invited Nazhip Khatmullovich to make a report this autumn at the International Congress of Chemists.
Responses to his works from religious and statesmen rained down.
King of Saudi Arabia Fahd sent his gratitude to Valitov for proving the truths of the Koran.
Now Professor Valitov considers himself a believer: - First, I proved the existence of God by formulas. And then opened it in my heart...
Georgy Khlebnikov,
candidate of philosophical sciences.
FROM THE EDITOR. By publishing this material, we risk a lot. We take risks because today, both believers and non-believers alike, agree that it is impossible to rationally prove the existence of God. True, by different reasons. If the former believe that this is impossible, since God is revealed to heart purity, and not to the intricacies of the mind, then the latter are convinced that since it is impossible to scientifically testify to the fact of the existence of God, then God does not exist, because. only science is objective.
However, not everyone knows that there is a centuries-old tradition in Christian culture. In the Middle Ages, such evidence became popular thanks to the Catholic scholastic theologians, primarily Anselm of Canterbury and Thomas Aquinas.
True, the scholastics, as a rule, turned their arguments not to atheists - what atheists in the Middle Ages! - but to believers, in order to rationally confirm the faith. Since the existence of God seemed obvious, "reasonable", then in the world, in life, philosophers sought to find obvious, reasonable confirmation of this.
It is interesting to note that in Orthodox tradition no such school of "proofs for the existence of God" emerged. Orthodoxy proceeded and proceeds from a different understanding of the relationship between faith and reason (although neither Orthodox nor Catholics, as a rule, oppose reason and faith). The main evidence in Orthodoxy was and remains the man himself, who has met God in his heart. And if this meeting did not happen, how can one believe? And if it happened, then the loving heart no longer needs any more arguments!
But after all, many of us were trained precisely in Western philosophy. And our thinking itself has acquired such a Western "taste". How many times have we heard: and you prove, rationally justify that God exists! And if, by and large, such evidence is unlikely to lead a person to God (such is the position of the editors), this does not mean that they are absolutely useless. After all, for someone they can be the first step on the path to faith ...
Today we live not in medieval Byzantium or Rus', but not in medieval Western Europe. Much water has flowed under the bridge since then, but the believing mind has not ceased to search inquisitively for the rational foundations of its faith, finding new and new evidence of the presence of the Creator in the world.
The following article is an attempt to enumerate and (for starters) short description searches in this area. Of course, one can not agree with all the arguments, and if someone is interested in this or that proof, the editors are ready to provide both the author and his opponents with an opportunity for discussion.
16 Proofs That God Exists
1. The first proof that can be called "existential" (that is, "proof from existence") is formulated as follows: Why is everything that is, rather than not?
After all, both creating something and maintaining the existence of something is much more difficult than having nothing at all. Try, for example, to independently design a cottage, choose for it appropriate place, build and constantly maintain order in it ... Or, for example, in order for your garden to be a real garden, it must be regularly dug up, planted, weeded, watered, etc. If this is not done, the garden will immediately overgrow with weeds, run wild and turn into an ordinary field without any trace of reasonable care.
In other words, the existence of any thing or structure requires a continuous expenditure of energy; when its internal supply is depleted or its influx from outside stops, the structure collapses. Therefore, the eternal existence of the Universe contradicts, for example, the second law of thermodynamics, according to which all the stars in the Universe should have died out long ago and even atoms would have decayed if, as atheist materialists claim, nature existed forever.
So why does it still exist as BEING, as a beautiful and wonderful Cosmos? Undoubtedly, only because it was created by Someone and has been maintained by Him since then.
This Creator is the God about whom Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), who formulated the laws of universal gravitation and motion, discovered differential calculus, said: “He abides forever; present everywhere; It constitutes the duration of time and space.
2. The second proof goes like this:
Why does everything that exists, naturally and amazingly ordered, bear the undoubted imprint of a reasonable plan for the arrangement of the whole? After all, such a plan cannot but presuppose the existence of a Mind that is superhuman in its capabilities, a truly divine Planner (since regularity is a property of the mind)?
So, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), who created the theory that the Sun is in the center of the universe, and the Earth only revolves around it, believed that this model demonstrates the wisdom of God in the universe, for “who else could place this lamp ( Sun) to a different or better position?”
When a watchmaker assembles a watch mechanism, he scrupulously fits one part to another, takes a spring of precisely calculated length, certain sizes hands, dial, etc. The result is a wonderful mechanism, which, by the very fact of the expediency and calculation of its device, points to the mind that created it.
But how much more complicated, more harmonious and more reasonable is the structure of the entire Universe around us, this beautiful Cosmos!
Albert Einstein (1879-1955), who formulated the theory of relativity, put it this way: “The harmony of natural law reveals a Mind so superior to us that, in comparison with it, any systematic thinking and action of human beings turns out to be a supremely insignificant imitation.”
The Universe, as the ancient Greeks said, is "Cosmos", that is, perfectly ordered and harmonious integrated system consisting of interrelated parts, each of which is subject to special laws, and all as a whole is governed by a combination of general laws, so that the pursuit of any particular goal miraculously contributes to the general goal of the whole.
Therefore, it is impossible to admit that all this was a matter of chance, and not of reasonable Providence, that is, the Providence of God.
3. " Cosmological proof"The existence of God was developed by the ancients (in particular, Aristotle) and is most often found in the following form: every thing in the world and everything, the entire Universe as a whole has a reason for its existence, but it is impossible to continue this sequence, the chain of reasons indefinitely - somewhere then there must be the First Cause, which is no longer conditioned by any other, otherwise everything turns out to be groundless, “hangs in the air.”
Not only philosophers speak about such a Cause, but also many naturalists and scientists. Thus, the famous Louis Pasteur (1822-1895), who developed, among other things, the world-famous milk purification process, which since then bears his name, often mentioned the "cosmic asymmetric Force" that created life. He believed that the concept of CAUSE "should be reserved for the single divine impulse that formed this Universe."
It is clear that God is such a causeless cause: “God is not a man” - He is spiritual (“ideal”, like a thought), that is, he is outside of time and space, therefore he does not arise, but exists forever, being not a cause in the physical sense of the word but the Creator visible universe and its laws.
4. " Anthropic principle Universe” as evidence of the existence of a reasonable plan for the structure of the Universe and God was, probably unwittingly, put forward by modern science, which suddenly found out that life on Earth, the emergence of man and the development of civilization are possible only in the presence and combination of extremely harsh and paradoxically improbable conditions that as if initially laid down in nature itself: a fixed distance from the Sun (a little closer to it - and living organisms would burn out, a little further - they would freeze, turning into insensible blocks of ice); the presence of the rotation of the Earth, without which unbearable heat would reign on one half of the planet, while the other would be constrained eternal ice; the existence of a certain size of a satellite that provides complex system circulation of water flows; minerals and resources: coal, metals, oil, water, etc., without which technogenic civilization could not arise and develop, etc.
Moreover, modern scientists have the impression that the entire universe is located and oriented in such a way that it can be viewed with human eyes! The existing coordination, interconnectedness and interdependence of these factors is such that the possibility of its "accidental" occurrence is completely excluded.
5. The following proof of the creation of the Cosmos by a reasonable will was also formulated at the forefront of modern cosmology and physics, which drew attention to the paradoxical existence of the Universe in the form in which it exists: it turned out that only four basic physical constants, without which it could not exist for a long time as a structurally organized whole, the probability of their "accidental" occurrence and coordination with each other is approximately 10 to the minus 100th degree. But there are not four basic constants, but even more ...
6. The following "teleological" (from the Greek "telos" - fulfillment, result) proof of the existence of God in general view It has been known since antiquity, when Aristotle first noticed the presence in the body of some animals and in nature of clearly expressed expediencies. However, only modern discoveries in biology have indisputably proved the systemic nature of these teleological mechanisms and their necessity for the existence and survival of almost all types of living beings.
A variation of the activity of these mechanisms is, for example, the “pre-established harmony” of the development of various living organisms, which, even in the embryonic state, seem to know in advance what they will have to face after birth.
And, - which Darwinian evolutionary theory is already completely unable to explain - studies of fossil organisms have shown that many of them have organs that anticipate external environmental conditions for millennia, organs that, under the actual conditions of the existence of these animals, are absolutely useless, but will really be needed. this species through hundreds of generations, when the conditions of existence will change radically!
A legitimate question arises, to which modern evolutionary theory has no answer: how can a mindless body have such amazing foreknowledge of future changes and how can it itself cause the required favorable mutations in itself ?!
This amazing fact clearly indicates the presence in the world of a definite and reasonable development program, that is, Providence, which is called the Providence of God.
7. The “transcendental” proof of the existence of the ideal world and God was partly discovered by Kant and can be represented as follows: there is a world outside of space and time - the spiritual world, the world of intellect, thought and free will - which is proved by the presence of thoughts in every person, which can refer to the past and the future, that is, "travel" to the past and the future, as well as instantly transported to any point in space.
Each of us, turning our consciousness to the source of our thoughts, can easily notice that they appear, as it were, from somewhere outside, the thought turns out to be a spiritual beam projected from somewhere, which illuminates material existence like a sunbeam - no way, no one and you never manage to cover it with your hand, it always ends up on top ...
Thus, a human thought, allegedly born in the brain, turns out to be both inside and outside of matter - it seems to arise due to neurophysiological processes in the brain tissues, surrounded by the bones of the skull, but, at the same time, fundamentally exists outside of any matter, outside of space and time.
Thanks to this, a person is clearly aware that he has a spiritual nature, which is fundamentally different from the physical world that surrounds him. But it follows from this that this other nature, this Spirit, the manifestation of which is man, also possesses both reason and free will - like man himself.
8. The following proof could probably be called "creationist" - it is based on the fact of the existence in nature of organisms and living systems that fundamentally cannot develop into a similar whole from parts in an evolutionary way, as Darwinism believes, but can only be created together as such an organic whole.
For example, the interconnected system of the heart, lungs and blood circulation in living beings can be attributed to them: it is impossible to imagine that at first, let’s say, only one blood circulation without a heart appeared, then the heart gradually “attached” to it and began to pump blood, and only after that lungs have just begun to develop.
9. Proof of the existence of God and the spiritual world from personal experience– most people have met in their lives with “strange” manifestations of the divine and superhuman: both beneficent, Divine, and malevolent, demonic, or, probably, most often, both together.
In order not to touch on many dubious "traditions of the deep antiquity", I will tell you about a case that happened to my colleague. He came from a believing family, but at one time he taught “scientific atheism” at a university for many years and, like most Soviet intellectuals, led a life that was by no means pious. After experiencing several personal tragedies, he realized the depravity of his life and decided to go to the temple.
“When the priest,” he told me, “read a prayer for remission of sins over my head, and I began to get on my feet, some unknown force suddenly began to throw me from side to side so that I could not stand on my feet: parishioners I was supported on both sides, my knees were shaking and, to top it off, I was suddenly seized by a strange weakness. So for the first time I felt on myself the demons that are in the sinner, he concluded.
Quite a few such examples could be cited.
10. Evidence from the existence of ALL nations and peoples ideas about God and superhuman powers in one form or another; if individual atheists are found among many peoples, then there are no "atheistic" nations on Earth.
11. Proof from faith in God of most of the outstanding geniuses of mankind. For example, the absolute majority of Nobel laureates.
It should also be remembered that all scientists who contributed to the emergence and development of modern science(Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Boyle, Bacon, Pasteur, Einstein) believed in God.
So, the founder of modern chemistry Robert Boyle (1627-1691) began every day with a prayer; moreover, 2/3 of the income of his estate in Ireland went to help the poor and support the Church, and 1/3 to the spread of Christianity and missionary work among the Indians.
Francis Collins, one of the founders of genetics, said: “Whenever we learn something new about the human genome, every time I feel a sense of awe that humanity now knows something that only God knew until now. I don't believe that Scientific research can somehow threaten God. On the contrary, I think that God only benefits from our curiosity.”
12. An undoubted proof of the existence of God is also the regular appearance in the history of mankind of great saints and religious figures who directly have spiritual revelations from above and thereby testify to His existence.
These are not only such prophets as, for example, Moses, Isaiah, Ezekiel, who constantly communicated with God, but also the righteous, who illuminated and directed the lives of people with their light at all times.
Perhaps it will be enough to simply remind the reader of such great Russian saints as John of Kronstadt to understand that God still addresses us as often now as in distant biblical times - if only there were eyes to see and ears to hear.
God is always with us, it is we who, due to our weakness, either move away, or again try to return to Him.
13. Proof by contradiction: the tragic fate of the projects (and often their own lives and fates) of prominent atheists. by the most a prime example here may be an example of the “Lenin-Stalin case” and their followers, who for the first time in history tried to build atheistic state on a "scientific basis" both in Russia and other countries of Europe and Asia.
For example, the fate of the best materialist philosopher of the USSR, Evald Vasilyevich Ilyenkov, the son of a famous Soviet writer, laureate of the Stalin Prize in literature, turned out to be tragic. All his life justifying the atheistic thesis about the “self-development of matter”, which does not need any spiritual foundation for its existence, Evald Vasilyevich could not find moral support anywhere in the Soviet atheistic reality, fell into a deep depression and committed suicide ...
14. Widely known is the "ethical proof" of the existence of the supersensible world, which proceeds from the objective existence of morality and ethical laws that regulate the behavior of human beings.
The studies of many philosophers indicate that events and influences environment only to a certain extent they can predetermine the behavior of people and force them to do certain actions: no matter how strong the pressure from the outside, a person always has the opportunity to break the causal relationship that unreasonable nature obeys and act as a free being, that is, as a being another, unearthly world!
To illustrate this, a simple example can be given: why do some people give alms, while others do not? It would seem that the latter act quite logically and reasonably - why part with your funds, money, knowing that you will not receive any compensation ?!
So what compels the former to still give alms, sometimes even on a significant scale? In the physical world, in nature, there is nothing that could explain such "illogical" behavior - this explanation lies outside of this, in the supersensible world, where there are great moral ideas of love, kindness and mercy.
The famous reasoning of Immanuel Kant, who clearly showed that a person in his actions and actions is guided by values that do not belong to the material world, belongs to the same type of evidence for the existence of God.
15. The proof of the existence of God called the "aesthetic argument" has also become widespread, which says: in nature there is an amazing supernatural beauty of the starry sky, sunsets and sunrises, northern lights, harmonious pictures of nature, the perfect arrangement of the beautiful bodies of living beings, etc., which seems to be specially designed for the aesthetic enjoyment of a rational being - a person - because there is simply no one besides him in nature itself to contemplate it.
The already mentioned Robert Boyle was so in awe of the beauty of nature that he often said: “When I study the book of nature ... I am often forced to exclaim with the psalmist: Oh, how diverse are Your creations, Lord, in Your wisdom You created them all!”
16. The proof of the existence of God "from the real to absolute perfection", put forward by Thomas Aquinas: in nature there is a clearly observable gradation of perfection within various kinds being, which can be understood only in the presence of an absolutely perfect Being, that is, God.
This proof may seem rather complicated at first, but a simple example will help to understand its essence: if you have a ruler, say, 30 centimeters long, and your colleague has 50 cm, if there are rolled meters and other measuring instruments, then all this exists only because the dimension of space (its extension in different directions) and the idea of length really exist.
In the same way, similar examples could be given with measures of weight, time, etc. But in nature, more complex types of gradations are also observed, among which a unique place belongs to the “ascending ladder” of perfection both in inanimate and living nature, and in human society, as well as among the people themselves: there are, for example, crooked and ugly trees, there are ordinary, unremarkable ones, there are “simply” beautiful, but there are also unusually beautiful, perfect specimens. And so not only among different types of trees, but also among various breeds fish, beasts, within human races, etc. – everywhere you can find more and less perfect individuals. But these different degrees of perfection in inanimate nature (for example, among stones!), between separate types of objects, living beings, etc., could not exist if there were no really existing measure of absolute perfection for them, which, however, we do not find in the material world, but which cannot but exist, and this perfection is God!
This is the essence of this proof.
Thus, we see that no matter where and how we start to consider surrounding a person world, all roads inevitably lead to the One who created and adorned it, Who constantly supports and guides it, and without Whom it could not exist even for a moment - to God.
Loading...